Corporate Outsourcing and Vendor Strategies

Reducing administrative costs and responsibilities is one of the well-known main advantages of outsourcing corporate services and vendor consolidation. However, some noteworthy advantages may be overlooked while assessing international business services suppliers because they should be more well-known. For a deeper look at how outsourcing can benefit financial operations, explore our article on Why Outsourcing Financial Services Makes Sense.

Outsourcing and vendor change can present important, well-known issues, such as creating and implementing new operational procedures. This article helps multinational organizations create effective vendor consolidation plans and perform due diligence on providers by outlining some of the main advantages and difficulties of outsourcing and vendor consolidation and how to handle these difficulties successfully.

The advantages of combining vendors and outsourcing corporate services

It should be no surprise to almost every business executive at a multinational corporation that outsourcing corporate services, including accounting, taxes, worldwide payroll, company secretarial, human resources, and other advisory services, can result in cost savings and increased efficiency. For those thinking about outsourcing or consolidation, it is worthwhile to summarize these and additional advantages.

• Streamlined operations and administration. In each operating nation, selecting, overseeing, and compensating local vendors burdens internal resources and raises the possibility of mistakes. Vendor consolidation can streamline operations and drastically lower these risks and burdens.
• Lower expenses. Increasing operational efficiencies is closely related to lowering operating costs. Furthermore, using a single provider for several projects across several nations encourages control and transparency and increases the number of options for negotiated prices.
• Improved responsibility and communication. Clear communication channels promptly resolve issues when a multinational corporation works with a single worldwide supplier. Holding a single contact accountable is also simple. Lastly, while evaluating the performance and controls of a single provider instead of several, an organization will need to execute fewer audits and quality reviews.
• They improved adherence and availability of local knowledge. Adhering to the laws and regulations of each country of operation is one of the riskiest and most challenging aspects of international expansion and operations. Clients can stay informed about and comply with evolving compliance requirements using a single source with local knowledge in various nations. When managing a single supplier, evaluating third-party controls is also simpler.
• In the event of ongoing cross-border expansion or when winding down unneeded organizations, using a single global supplier that offers various services and unified platforms avoids or significantly minimizes the requirement to screen and engage new local providers. Additionally, this encourages rapidity to market and strategic flexibility.
• More straightforward platform integration. Reducing the number of vendor platforms significantly reduces administrative burdens, such as those associated with technical integration, internal training, and continuing management.
• Enhanced protection and administration of data. Using a global vendor with strong data controls reduces the likelihood of data breaches and ensures compliance with laws like the GDPR.

The difficulties associated with vendor consolidation

When creating a corporate strategy and screening providers, the difficulties of switching global corporate service providers must be adequately considered. The idea of transitioning vendors, including global payroll and accounting providers, may invoke concerns among staff about new operational procedures and platform integration. These are a few primary obstacles to moving to a single worldwide corporate services provider.

• Duties under an existing contract. When a contract renewal is near, many organizations consider switching suppliers. However, when a company uses a global corporate services provider, it may already have numerous contracts in various countries, each with a particular set of terms and termination dates for payroll, tax filings, HR advice, etc. Administrative burdens and unforeseen costs (such as early termination fees) may result from understanding and adhering to these rules.
• Internal opposition. Changing providers frequently entails altering platforms, procedures, communication styles, and other elements. In addition to performing their daily responsibilities, employees are frequently requested to finish training and other transition-related tasks. Employee opposition to the change may arise from these burdens.
• Know your commitments to your customers. Switching providers inevitably involves fulfilling KYC obligations. Reputable corporate service providers can make the KYC procedure easier, for example, by using AI-driven compliance or a central data repository. However, KYC requirements are, by definition, burdensome and should not be undervalued.
• New procedures and platform integration. The unpleasant realities of integrating technological platforms cannot be avoided, just like with the KYC procedure. Changing providers usually entails transferring data by relevant data protection laws and implementing new platforms. New business procedures are also created when platforms are switched, and there may be a transitional phase during which the platforms must be used concurrently, which can result in heavy administrative workloads.
• Moving to a global supplier will require extensive training for staff members to comprehend new platforms and procedures, which will momentarily lower output and may harm morale.
• Opposition from current suppliers. An organization may occasionally be at the mercy of its current providers, such as when transferring payroll data and switching providers. Transition budgets and schedules may be better if an existing provider fails to fulfil requests or meet deadlines.

Overcoming the difficulties posed by vendor consolidation

As we’ve seen, moving to a single global services provider presents several difficulties. Still, it’s crucial to remember that these difficulties are doable and that, in most cases, the long-term advantages of consolidation greatly exceed the immediate costs.

A respectable worldwide services provider won’t make the difficulties of vendor consolidation any more accessible during the RFP process. It will help you navigate the shift by outlining the problems and drawing on their technical and operational expertise. Follow these steps to successfully oversee the change to a single worldwide corporate services supplier.

• Create a stakeholder team for vendor consolidation. An organization should assemble a group of stakeholders from key functional areas and operating nations before starting the vendor consolidation process. Those from HR, payroll, tax, legal, procurement, and finance are examples of familiar stakeholders.
• Map out and assess current contracts and vendors. Before assessing international corporate services providers, an organization should obtain crucial third-party vendor information. This information should include the services offered, the countries in which the vendor operates, the main terms of the contract (such as the dates of termination and any penalties for early termination), and whether the service levels are satisfactory.
• Investigate international service suppliers and exercise due diligence. Investigate international corporate service providers to meet your unique requirements, including fund administration, tax and accounting, HR and expatriate advising services, legal entity creation and upkeep, and worldwide payroll.
• Simplify the RFP procedure. Create straightforward, consistent requests for proposals that focus only on the data you require to reach a judgment. You can evaluate comparable data across responses and lessen administrative expenses with clear, simple RFPs. Inquire about the technical platforms, security measures, implementation schedules and goals, worldwide reach, ability to bill in a single currency and the providers’ entire range of services.
• Get leadership approval before choosing a vendor. The stakeholder team should record its findings and suggest a vendor after due investigation. The team should present its findings to corporate leadership with the anticipated organizational cost savings and a high-level implementation plan for evaluation and approval. It is imperative to secure the backing of the leadership to gain the support of the staff members who will put the changes into practice
• .
• Create a plan for the transition. In collaboration with the chosen international supplier, create a thorough transition strategy with deadlines and areas of responsibility. This plan should be monitored regularly and changed as necessary. The strategy should cover data migration, integration testing, additional roles and duties, communication tactics, and training.
• Keep in constant contact with internal stakeholders. It’s critical to explain the transition plans to all impacted personnel, including those who will be affected (like those getting paid) and those who will assist in implementing the changes (like payroll staff). Give staff members plenty of warning in advance, give them regular updates, and ensure they can readily ask questions, offer recommendations, and supply other information.
• Notify current existing providers and collaborate with them. Ensure your current and departing vendors know the impending changes to facilitate a seamless transition. Establish the assumption that both parties will continue to be professional throughout the relationship and, if needed, negotiate exit arrangements.
• Offer assistance and training. Collaborating with the new supplier, create and carry out a training program that may include written and video resources, live online training, artificial intelligence tools, and more. To guarantee that the implementation won’t harm your clients, encourage your staff and assist them in setting priorities.
• Establish service level metrics and monitor vendor performance Schedule frequent meetings with the global service provider to ensure they fulfil service-level obligations and resolve issues quickly. The meetings must include daily service delivery, modifications to corporate strategy, and changes to corporate services best practices.

Please contact us immediately at GERAI LTD with any questions